Gender considerations in informal food markets in sub-Saharan Africa

In this blog, originally posted on Agrilinks, Kristina Roesel, postdoctoral scientist at the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), discusses how gender roles can influence health risks in Africa's informal food markets. Kristina previously served as coordinator of ILRI's Safe Food Fair Food project.

Gender moves beyond biology to consider the socially constructed roles, behavior, activities, and attributes that determine the power relations between men and women. Gender analyses take a close look at men’s and women’s relationships and how these relations define each other’s responsibilities, rights, division of labor, interests, and needs. This can help explain social determinants for equity, as well as undesirable health outcomes, and create opportunities to better prevent these.

Different roles for men and women could potentially result in different benefits and risks. Both women and men have important roles in producing, processing, selling, and preparing food in informal markets in sub-Saharan Africa. These roles may have impacts – both positive and negative – on their own socio-economic status, including market access; their own health, including occupational exposure to diseases; and the health of others who consume the food they supply, including nutrition benefits and foodborne risks.

Gender-based roles in animal sourced food production in sub-Saharan Africa can have different health and economic risks, including:

  • In West Africa, where men dominate milk production, they are more at risk from diseases associated with cows during milking (e.g., brucellosis). On the other hand, in smallholder farms in Kenya where women are in charge of milking, the situation is reversed.
  • In Ghana, men own the cattle and are responsible for milking, feeding, and care, while women and girls assist with collecting water and feeds and cleaning. Women are responsible for boiling, fermenting, and selling the milk. If done consistently, boiling and fermenting milk reduces the level of pathogens and contaminants. Also, women will be able to tell bad milk (clotting on boiling) from good milk; therefore, these practices can have positive or negative effects on the quality and safety of the milk and the health outcomes of the customers.
  • Both men and women agree that the need for lifting and moving carcases means men predominate in slaughtering. However, this does not apply to all animal species, and excludes women from market participation. In most African countries, women slaughter poultry for home consumption but only men are employed in formal poultry slaughter houses. For sellers of meat, too, there are no stringent physical requirements, yet in west Nigeria most are men, while in Vietnam nearly all are women.
  • In artisanal coastal fishing in West Africa, men are responsible for the fishing but women are in charge of the on-shore processing (smoking) and marketing. The smoking practice not only exposes the women to health hazards such as eyestrain and headaches, it also increases levels of potentially carcinogenic residues in the fish that are a result of using an unsuitable type of wood for smoking fish.

Some differences in health and nutrition states are attributable to biology; for example, pregnancy brings many risks to health. Others are attributable to gender roles. For instance, in some countries, girls and women are not supposed to eat meat in order not to become “too strong and outspoken.” This is because meat is considered energy-rich, making “strong bones.” In some cases, men or boys may experience worse health outcomes because they are allowed to eat more meat. For example, barbecued meat is often consumed with alcohol in small bars in Tanzania. This puts men at greater risk from meat-associated pathogens.

A gender perspective in food safety research can ensure that men’s and women’s differential exposure to agriculture-related risks are better understood and interventions better targeted, particularly as it relates to health outcomes. It can also ensure that women and men have increased capacity to manage food safety, nutritional, and economic risks, and are more involved in their surveillance depending on their role in the supply chain.

 

This article is adapted from a chapter in the book "Food safety and informal markets: animal products in sub-Saharan Africa," published by Routledge in 2014.

More information:

 

This post is part of a blog, the Gender-Nutrition Idea Exchange, maintained by the CGIAR Research Program on Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH). To add your comments below, please register with Disqus or log in using your Facebook, Twitter, or Google accounts. You must be signed in or registered to leave a comment.